Pearl Snaps

Stories of a cowgirl living life by her own lights


42 Comments

Horse Slaughter: A Hard Sell

By Jesse Bussard

Reports of the reinstatement of horse slaughter have remained constant in news media since the passage of an ag appropriations bill by Congress in November of 2011 that lifted the federal ban on horse slaughter, refunding federal inspection of horse meat. Along with these reports have come recent announcements of plans to build horse processing plants in some states.

One plan for a processing plant slated for Mountain Grove, Mo., in particular has been brought to a screeching halt by local residents. Proponents of the plan did their best to sell the idea to locals touting jobs and tax revenue. However, stories of community stigma, foul odors, and environmental concerns via testimony and public records gathered while the last three horse processing plants in the United States operated were more convincing.

Residents told Wyoming state legislator, Sue Wallis, and Chevideco, the Belgian company to sponsor the plant, “Go home! If we have a horse problem we’ll solve it ourselves. We don’t need her (Wallis) and a Belgium company coming in here.” With that bold-faced response, Unified Equine, run by Wallis and Chevideco, announced they’d look elsewhere.

Since then a plan for a processing plant in Oregon has been announced and hints of the possibility of another in middle Tennessee. Whether these two projects will be met with the same opposition is yet to be seen.

As I’ve said in previous columns, I personally do not feel that there will be any horses slaughtered on U.S. soil anytime soon. The recent shutdown of the plan in Missouri shows me that it’s going to take more than the promise of some jobs and money to convince people that horse slaughter is a good thing.

In addition, a January poll conducted by the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), which telephone surveyed 1,008 registered voters, found that 80% of respondents were opposed to the slaughter of U.S. horses for human consumption. The ASPCA’s poll provides further evidence that the general public isn’t buying what horse slaughter proponents are selling. There is an element of questionability as to the demographics of the ASPCA sample pool, but with that aside, the evidence is still pretty convincing to me.

At one time, I was fully on the side of the pro-horse slaughter crowd. But over time, through various conversations and watching the progression of the pro- and anti-horse slaughter campaigns, I’ve become skeptical. Though I may understand the benefits of slaughter, the general public does not, and to be quite honest, I don’t think they want to.

The fact is the concept of consuming horse meat has become taboo and unfathomable to most in everyday society. Americans have not consumed horse meat since during the World War II era. And because of this, the reintroduction of horse slaughter into the United States is a hard, may I say almost impossible, sell.

I’m not trying to be pessimistic here, just realistic. We can sit and argue the pros and cons of horse slaughter until we’re blue in the face. But I have a feeling that all the convincing in the world won’t change the general public’s view of the practice.

In the end, arguing does neither side any good. The reality is we’ve got an unwanted horse problem in this country, and the sooner we stop arguing, the sooner we can start finding solutions.

This article was originally featured as my May View from the Range column for Tack ‘n Togs. You can access a pdf version here.

Related news:

New Mexico Governor to USDA: Deny Horse Processing Permit


Leave a comment

Grazing improves ag sustainability

by Jesse Bussard

Some of the most environmentally conscious people I know are livestock farmers and ranchers.

Through various stewardship practices, they ensure that the land they live on will continue to flourish and thrive for years to come, providing grazing for their livestock and habitat for countless species of wildlife.

Currently, an estimated 587 million acres of permanent grassland, pasture and rangeland are used for livestock grazing across the U.S. Much of this land is unsuitable for growing crops for many reasons, e.g., it is rocky, steep terrain or has marginal soil quality. However, it provides suitable forage plants like grasses and forbs that can be grazed by livestock.

By having the ability to graze this land, farmers and ranchers are able to more than double the land area for producing food.

In my graduate studies, I have made it my focus to better understand these livestock grazing systems and, in turn, find ways to help farmers and ranchers improve upon them.

Many times, the importance of the relationship among the grazing animal, the forage plants being grazed and the soil supporting the forage goes overlooked. This key relationship, known as the plant/animal interface, creates a dynamic ecosystem in pastures and rangeland grazing systems.

As livestock graze a pasture, they affect forage composition, plant canopy structure and the growth rate of the forage. These changes in the pasture forage, in turn, affect the animals’ grazing behavior and their ability to obtain their needed supply of nutrients.

To manage this system properly, farmers and ranchers must not only understand the livestock’s nutritional needs and grazing behavior but also the unique physiology and growth requirements of the plants.

Grazing animals require nutrients for maintenance energy needs, growth and development, milk production and fetal growth and development. The challenge of the livestock manager is to leave enough pasture forage after grazing to maintain some leaf tissue for light interception to generate energy for above- and below-ground growth.

To maintain this balance, livestock farmers have developed many different types of grazing systems. Some are continuous, where cattle graze for indefinite periods of time; others are rotational, where cattle are moved from one grazing area to the next.

Grazing systems vary on each farm and geographic region and are tailored to meet the needs of each particular livestock species and the forages present.

Each system has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. The more intensive or highly managed a grazing system, the more inputs and labor required.

Intensive rotational grazing systems are favored over continuous as they improve sustainability by maintaining pasture condition and preventing overgrazing, and through the closer management scheme, farmers are able to keep a more watchful eye on their animals.

Pastures are a dynamic ecosystem. By utilizing grazing systems on America’s pastures and rangelands, farmers and ranchers help to keep this ecosystem in balance.

The relationship that exists between the cow and the grass is very similar to that of the wild buffalo or elk that once roamed America’s grasslands.

If animals were grazed too long on a particular location, plants would become vulnerable to environmental stresses. At the same time, without the presence of grazing animals to consume forages, overgrowth would die and could promote fires and desertification. Each needs the other to keep it in check.

This sustainable practice helps to maintain plant biodiversity and wildlife habitat and prevent the encroachment of invasive weeds, all while allowing farmers and ranchers to continue to produce food for the nation on land that may not otherwise be suitable for agricultural production.

This post was originally featured as my April column for Feedstuffs Foodlink and can be accessed here.


Leave a comment

Forage Friday: Change Grazing Strategies to Handle Early Forage Flush

It’s Forage Friday! Here’s my latest post on Fodder for Thought for Beef Producer Magazine.

by Jesse Bussard

This winter was one of the mildest on record and this spring seems to be starting off in similar fashion with unseasonably warm temperatures. Here in Kentucky we are nearly two to three weeks ahead of schedule in our growing season.

This earlier growing season has led cool-season forage grasses and small grains to reach optimum feed quality at a more rapid rate. Ray Smith, extension forage specialist at University of Kentucky, said this is the earliest forages have matured in the seven years he’s been at the university.

This situation creates a need for beef producers to implement a slightly different grazing management strategy than they may usually consider. To take advantage of this earlier grazing opportunity, producers will need to think outside the box. This is where a little knowledge about plant growth cycles and grazing management can come in handy.

Read the entire post on Fodder for Thought by clicking here.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 169 other followers