Pearl Snaps

Stories of a cowgirl living life by her own lights


Leave a comment

Hereford Breeders Respond to HSUS

via Hereford World Magazine

by Craig Huffhines, Executive Vice President, American Hereford Association

When you hear the words factory farming, what does that mean to you? If you were to define traditional beef cattle management practices, would any of those practices cause stress or cruelty to an animal? For those of us who have grown up on beef cattle farms and ranches, we acknowledge that some of our practices
inevitably induce stress, but none of the things we do are perceived by us as cruel or unusual treatment to livestock. After all, Dad and Granddad taught us that this was the way it is supposed to be done, but to others there are far different perceptions.

Political pressure built from “full-courtpress” lobbying, massive promotion and campaign contributions to legislative activists, and media blitzes is influencing a growing number of public sympathizers as it relates to humane handling. This movement is coming from a deep-pocketed organization that can and does influence the opinions of governmentthought leaders. That’s been the recipe of the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS).

During the last decade, HSUS, the world’s largest animal advocacy group with reported assets of $160 million, has influenced agriculture legislation across the country. It is not just about dog and cat shelters as HSUS television commercials would have you believe. The organization has influenced legislators by convincing them that certain common animal handling and management practices are inhumane. The ultimate goal of HSUS is to eliminate or at least
reduce the consumption of meat and other animal-based foods and products.

Wayne Pacelle, HSUS CEO, openly announces his intentions from his HSUS blog. “The HSUS promotes eating with conscience and embracing the three Rs — reducing the consumption of meat and other animalbased foods; refining the diet by avoiding products from the worst production systems (e.g., switching to cage-free eggs); and replacing meat and other animal-based foods in the diet with plant-based foods.”

Pacelle goes on to write, “The HSUS is a big tent organization, and we support people who want to switch to more humanely
raised animal products, reduce the amount of meat in their diets, or try a vegetarian lifestyle — but the reduction of meat consumption is one of the best things we can do for the planet given how unsustainable the current levels of factory farming are.”

The HSUS’s underlying mission is where the battle will be fought. The perfect example of this is the dramatic negative impact  upon the equine industry that the U.S. horse slaughter ban has had.

Our challenge as beef producers and Hereford breeders is to define, scientifically justify and articulate our common management practices in an effort to get ahead of the HSUS machine. A sound defense of our management practices with
creative promotion in an aggressive, carefully crafted and understandable way may, at a minimum, cause those that are not in the know to question restrictive regulations that could force us out of business. This is not an appealing or interesting conversation, but it is a fact of life that threatens the very core of our business.

To read the full article click here.


Leave a comment

Soring undermines horse industry’s good reputation

by Jesse Bussard

My May 2011 View from the Range column for Tack ‘n Togs:

You’d think as an industry, we’d have gotten past using these types of training methods. But it seems we still haven’t. Recently a federal grand jury in Tennessee has returned an indictment against three people, alleging the trio was involved in a conspiracy around the soring of horses.

Soring of horses is, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, “The application of any chemical or mechanical agent applied to the lower leg or hoof of any horse that causes pain, or, can be expected to cause pain, for the purpose of “enhancing” the horse’s gait for show purposes is strictly prohibited under The Horse Protection Act, as amended (15 U.S.C. SS 1821 – 1831).” In short, it’s hurting the horse to alter its gait.

The effect of this practice is dramatic. Because of the severe pain caused by the soring, the horses are forced to raise their front legs immediately after touching the ground. This produces an exaggerated gait, which for many gaited breeds is a desired trait in the show ring.

The offenses alleged to the individuals are breaches of the federal Horse Protection Act.

The Horse Protection Act of 1970 was enacted by Congress making it an offense to show, sell, auction, and exhibit or transport a sored horse or a horse whose hooves have been chemically or physically altered to inflict pain that causes an exaggerated gait in the showring common among many gaited breeds of horses. United States Attorney Bill Killian stated, “The alleged violations in this indictment undermine the equine industry and give unfair advantage to some over others, in addition to causing cruelty to the animals.”

The individuals indicted are alleged of soring horses in order to win competitions without being detected by authorities, in order to gain more customers for boarding and training. Methods of soring allegedly used included placing bolts in horses’ feet and taping blocks to horses’ feet.

Along with these indictments has come the praises of the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). HSUS applauded U.S. authorities for the indictments. Though this may sound all well and good, anything that involves HSUS tends to make me a little skeptical. If you don’t know already, HSUS is no better than PETA, sharing the same extremist animal rights views and whose hidden agenda is to eliminate all use of animals by people, whether for food, clothing, critical medical research, or the enjoyment of pets, and that includes riding, showing, and even owning horses.

When you get right down to it, the real question here is: Why is soring still being practiced by people in the horse industry? Even after federal legislation was passed banning its use some people just continue to do. It’s these “bad apples” in the crowd that need to be sorted out and prosecuted. Individuals who continue to use these illegal, inhumane practices on horses are ultimately just giving animal rights activists another avenue by which to criticize the horse industry.

We’ve already seen this in PETA’s recent protest of carriage horses in New York City. And as I’ve said before it’s only a matter of time until these animal rights groups begin protesting the use of horses for other equestrian sports such as three-day eventing, show jumping, and endurance riding. Our common goal should be to maintain the good reputation of the horse industry. By allowing practices such as soring to continue, we undermine this goal. As responsible horse owners, it is our job to ensure the public and our legislators that we care about our horses and want only the best for them.


Leave a comment

Humane Society of the US has backward priorities

by Jake Geis

Local humane societies are wonderful things, one of the more underappreciated organizations in America. They provide a second chance to many pets that otherwise would have been put down or left to starve. Unfortunately, the Humane Society of the United States is not one of these. It is not the national office of our local humane societies, but rather an activist organization whose main goal is to end animal agriculture, hunting and research. It capitalizes on the confusion of using the words “humane society” in its name to sucker unsuspecting people into donating to them and not to the local humane societies where the money is desperately needed.

The Humane Society of the United States, abbreviated HSUS, claims its goal is to raise money nationally to give grants to animal shelters across the nation. It cites the $450,000 in grants it gave in 2008 as an example. While this may sound impressive, these donations comprise less than one-half of 1 percent of its budget. Considering HSUS has a budget of $99.7 million, that $450,000 in grants is more like advertising than actual help for animals.

HSUS gave absolutely zero dollars to Nebraska animal shelters between 2006 and 2008. The only time HSUS directly interacts with animals is by jumping into ongoing, high profile animal abuse cases that were already being handled by other organizations, or planting spies in animal handling facilities in order to benefit its national advertising.

Where does HSUS spend its money then? It spends it on two main items — anti-agriculture campaigns and itself. It is the stated goal of its CEO, Wayne Pacelle, to build the “National Rifle Association of animal rights groups.” In the same year HSUS gave a paltry one-half of 1 percent to actual animal shelters, it spent $2.25 million on an anti-meat ballot campaign in California. It has been involved in similar campaigns in other states, as well as anti-trapping, hunting and animal research campaigns. Ironically, even when it has an opportunity to help in animal cruelty cases, it refuses to. In November 2007, HSUS planted an operative in a slaughter facility in California and filmed footage of an incident of animal cruelty. This incident was contrary to established regulations and standard operating procedures in the United States. Instead of reporting this incident to the U.S. Department of Agriculture to correct the situation, HSUS held the video and refused to give it to the proper authorities, allowing the abuse to continue. It only released the video when it corresponded with the launching of its anti-meat campaign in California.

Another example of HSUS having no interest in preventing animal cruelty is in Ohio. In 2009, farmers petitioned the legislature to put Issue 2 on the ballot, establishing a livestock standards board including farmers, veterinarians, scientists and local humane society professionals who would have to be approved by the state government. This board would govern how livestock would be raised in the state and help ensure them a comfortable life. Rather than hailing this as a step forward in animal treatment, HSUS vehemently opposed the measure and launched a campaign to stop it.  Ohioans were not fooled and passed Issue 2 by a 64 percent to 36 percent margin.

Immediately afterward, HSUS worked to discredit the board and  override its authority. It used threats of launching another ballot initiative campaign to leverage the board into making standards that would eventually eliminate animal agriculture in the state; fortunately the group could not get enough signatures to get the initiative on the ballot. Currently, HSUS and the board have agreed to a deal, but HSUS is looking to work on another initiative for the future to force its views on Ohio.

Despite all of the money HSUS spends on political campaigns, the group’s number one expenditure is itself. According to its 2009 IRS Form 990, the not-for-profit group tax form, HSUS had a revenue of $101.6 million, and spent $35.8 million on salaries and benefits, $2.6 million on pensions, and $22.3 million on advertising. Grants to actual humane societies were less than two percent.  According to Atlanta’s ABC affiliate WSB-TV, HSUS collected $34 million after Hurricane Katrina supposedly for animal shelters, however only $7 million actually went to that cause. The rest went back to HSUS as “expenses.” If you are more interested in seeing how HSUS spends its money, check out humanewatch.org.

While HSUS is awash in millions of dollars to spent on itself and its political campaigns, local humane societies remain strapped for money, lowering the standard of living for shelter animals. So instead of responding to the HSUS telemarketer with a credit card, send money or volunteer time at the local humane societies that would greatly appreciate the help. This is where the real need is, and there are many friendly barks and purrs there that would love to greet you.

Today’s post was brought to you courtesy of Jake Geis, a second year veterinary currently studying at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.  This article was previously published in the Daily Nebraskan on November 18, 2010.  You can find Jake on Facebook and Twitter.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 168 other followers