Pearl Snaps

Stories of a cowgirl living life by her own lights

Leave a comment

Moosday: T-Bone, One Happy Hereford

Today’s Moosday photos feature my family’s yearling herd bull, T-Bone, that we purchased earlier this year.  T-Bone was sired by Ribeye (yes, that’s his real name!) a registered purebred polled Hereford bull owned by my past beef cattle professor at Penn State University, Dr. Dan Kniffen.  T-Bone came to live with my family back in early March and I will say he’s been a happy boy ever since.  Being a bull, his main purpose is to breed the cows (what male wouldn’t be happy with that!).  Now that breeding season is over we’re all anxious to see what next year’s calf crop will bring.  I know one thing, there will be lots of little white faces running around.  Hopefully I can share some of those with you in the spring!

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Leave a comment

Selecting the “Right” Bull

My family recently purchased a new herd bull for our cow-calf operation back home in Pennsylvania.  He’s a purebred Hereford yearling bull out of SHF RIB EYE M326 R117.  Given his daddy’s name, we’ve decided to call the new addition to the herd, T-Bone.  With all this talk about bulls, I figured it would be a fitting time to talk about selecting the “Right” bull.  This article by Dr. Billy Cook of the Noble Foundation in Ardmore, OK does a great job of explaining all the factors cattle producers must take into consideration when selecting the right bull.

Selecting the “Right Bull”

by Billy Cook

A question of paramount importance to cattle producers is Which bull is right for my production system? Selecting the “right” bull can potentially contribute more to the genetic improvement and profitability of a cow-calf operation than any other management practice.

Breed: If you are uncertain about the breed of bull to purchase, consider these factors: market acceptance of the product you are selling, availability of potential herd sires, and breed compatibility with your cow herd and production environment.

Age: There is an ongoing debate concerning the age bulls should be when a producer purchases them. Purchasing yearling bulls seems to offer some initial economic advantage, because their initial cost may be lower than that of two-year-olds, but yearling bulls must be managed to allow continued growth and development, which increases cost. Two-year-old bulls typically are more expensive but are usually able to service more cows and require less supplemental feed. As long as one understands the trade-offs between two-year-olds and yearlings, either can be an economically feasible option.

Keep in mind that both breed and age can affect bull fertility, and familiarize yourself with the typical age at sexual maturity for the specific breed you are considering. It is imperative for any bull to have passed a breeding soundness evaluation that checks his physical soundness, scrotal circumference measurement, and semen quality within thirty days of purchase.

Once you determine breed and age, select bulls by using four tools: phenotype, pedigree, expected progeny differences (EPDs), and individual performance.


Phenotype is the visible properties of an animal. Each of us can visualize the ideal phenotype of a bull. However, chances are that we have never seen this ideal animal, much less had the opportunity to purchase it. Therefore, we must compromise when selecting the phenotype of a particular bull. Correctness of feet and legs, muscle thickness, and masculinity are a few of the phenotypic traits that one should consider. Lameness or structural problems are among the leading reasons for culling bulls.

Although disposition is not actually a phenotypic characteristic, one should certainly evaluate it in all potential herd bulls. There are entirely too many bulls available to risk buying a bull with a bad disposition.


Many commercial bull buyers tend to ignore the pedigree of an animal because it is going on commercial cows, but knowledge of pedigree allows more predictable, consistent offspring. If you as a commercial breeder are unfamiliar with a particular breed’s pedigree, contact a reputable breeder, breed representative, or breed association for additional information. Familiarization with breed pedigrees can certainly pay dividends in commercial cow-calf production.

Expected progeny differences (EPDs)

EPDs are defined by the Beef Improvement Federation as the difference in performance to be expected from progeny of a particular sire compared to the expected progeny of the average bull in the same breed. EPDs do not predict actual performance levels for traits: they predict differences in performance levels of individuals as parents. For example, if bull A has a weaning weight (WW) EPD of 20 pounds and bull B has one of 5 pounds, we would expect an average 20-pound WW advantage for a large group of calves sired by bull A compared to bull B.

Few if any breeds’ average EPDs equal zero. Therefore, before meaningful comparisons can be made, you must know the current breed’s EPD averages (table 1). Breed average EPDs are available in breed sire summaries, most of which are available on the Internet or free of charge from the respective breed association. Never compare EPDs across breeds.

All EPDs have an associated accuracy value that measures their reliability. Highly accurate EPDs (> 0.70) are very reliable. On the other hand, the average progeny performance of an individual with low accuracy values may be different from what his EPDs suggest. Most bulls are purchased when young and have had no progeny. The accuracy value on these young bulls is typically low, indicating that some performance variation from the published EPD is likely to occur in their offspring. Also, the low accuracy suggests that the young bull’s EPD values may change as progeny data are collected. Nevertheless, EPDs on young bulls provide offspring performance insight that can’t be obtained elsewhere.


There are several bull test stations at which performance tested bulls are available. Operators at these stations compare individual performance of potential herd sires by feeding large numbers of similar age bulls at a single location, allowing meaningful comparisons to be made between individual bulls. Typically, two or more ratios are combined, resulting in a composite index that is usually specific to that particular test station. Traits typically used in the test station indices include test average daily gain, adjusted yearling weight, and weight per day of age. Other traits may be included, depending upon specific breed or test station guidelines. Remember to compare ratios or indices only between bulls from a specific test. No comparisons can be made between tests starting at different times or between different test stations.

Putting it all together

Each of the aforementioned characteristics should be considered a tool. Just as it takes multiple tools to build a house, so also it takes a variety of tools to identify the “right” bull for a herd. If you are considering a bull from a production sale or a performance test sale, request the sale catalog early, study the published performance information (EPDs and individual), and critique the different pedigrees available. Make your initial choices based upon the information you have available before arriving at the sale site. Once at the site, critique the phenotype and disposition of each of the bulls you selected. If the physical characteristics are acceptable, select the bull as a candidate for purchase.

To learn more about how to understand and use EPDs in your herd, check out this extension publication from the University of Minnesota.


What’s the only free lunch in the cattle business?

“The only free lunch in the cattle business is Heterosis.”  Those were the words of my beef production and management professor, Dr. Daniel Kniffen, from Penn State University.  This is also known as hybrid vigor.  Heterosis is the increase in such characteristics as size, growth rate, fertility, and yield of a hybrid organism over those of its parents.

A recent study released by the American Hereford Association (AHA) in cooperation with California State University, Chico; Lacey Livestock; Harris Feeding Co.; and Harris Ranch Beef Co. examined the possible benefits of heterosis from crossing Angus and Hereford cattle.  The objective of the research project was to conduct a controlled crossbreeding system, comparing progeny sired by Hereford and Angus bulls, under commercial conditions, emphasizing economic differences at the ranch, feedlot and packing plant.  The study covered a three year period and compared the progeny by Hereford and Angus bulls when crossed on Angus-based cows.

This is one of Dr. Kniffen's yearling Hereford bulls that was sired by Ribeye, one of the bulls used in this study.

The most prominent advantage found was that calves sired by Hereford bulls have a $30/head documented advantage in feedlot profitability and a 7% advantage in fertility when compared to Angus-sired calves.  The study also found a maternal advantage of 7% higher pregnancy rate when comparing Hereford-sired females to Angus-sired females.  CSU-Chico found the most notable and dramatic difference to be the lower feed conversion for the Hereford-sired calves over all three years.  This combined with other favorable traits leads to lower costs of gain and breakevens for the Hereford-sired cattle.

To read more about this study check out “Cattle Breeds: Study Shows $30 Hereford Heterosis Advantage“.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 215 other followers